Literature review Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Literature review - Research Paper ExampleIn Edwins view, it was wrong to use information collected from men to arrive at conclusions about the good society without seeking the views of both women and men. He argued that it was this hierarchy in society that had rendered women voiceless over the years. The main proponent of the theory is Cheris Kramarae. The Muted Group opening has been used for purposes of communication studies. Cheris Kramarae, once a professor in charge of Womens Studies, worked with various lecturers from around the world. According to Cheris Kramarae, the ideas contained in the Muted Group Theory state that men created communication as a tool for taking advantage of women (Kramarae, 1981). The theory requires women to playact strictly within the confines of the language developed by man and are therefore not allowed to have their own way of expressing their feelings and thoughts. Muted convocation theory a worry provides an explanation as to why there ar e groups in society that have a voice while some are mute. In her 1974 study, Chens Kramarae focused on how the characters in cartoons are quite deceptive. She noted that the female cartoon characters were envisioned as being apologetic and emotional. They are besides depicted as flowery and vague in the way they communicate. Words such as pretty and nice are used to refer to these characters. It is from this initial study that she found evidence that supported the muted group theory (Griffin, 1997, p. 459). LITERATURE REVIEW The number one book of account that I will analyze is the book written by Belenky titled Womens ways of cognise the development of self, voice and mind. In this book, the informant analyzes the way womens feelings are not adequately served. The author argues that this is probably the reason why women face challenges when trying to climb the corporate ladder (Belenky, 1986). The author also states that in many cultures women are ignored and often discourag ed from joining male dominated industries withal when they have the knowledge required. What was disappointing about this book was that the Muted Group theory was not mentioned and I had to critically analyze it in order to gather relevant information out of it. The author also used several theorists to explain herself which made the book even more complicated to analyze. The second book I will review is a book by Griffen titled the Proprietors of language and argues that language was developed by men and that women were not consulted in its development. In this case men are referred to as the dominate group while women, the mute group (Griffen, 2004). Muted Group theory is used to explain the reason why some groups in the society in this case women are silent. According to Ardener, this group that is muted underside be studied from a gendered outlook. Females behave differently from males because they are constructed in a different way. It is these uniform differences that Arden er argues qualify women to be classified among the muted groups and undervalued in society. The aspect of this book that I did not like was that the chapters were not directly related to the Muted Group theory either. The issues discussed were however quite interesting disrespect not being topical. It was however